Wednesday, June 11, 2014

Yet another - old - rant.

As usual, I spend a lot of time with tongue-in-cheek in this one, and I suspect people who know me will get a laugh or two, but it concerns a serious subject, and it takes a very sobering turn at the end. Frankly, I seriously suggest that loving Mom's, especially those with little children, allow trusted friends or loved ones to read it first and suggest whether or not they should read it.



It was actually a very pleasant experience, and one which I will own up to having, even though it took place within several hundred yards of D.C.

It was Monday of the week just passed, and I was sitting in comfort outside the Cozi Deli in Arlington, enjoying marvelous weather, a Bombay salad, and a bottle of S. Pellegrino. Nearby, a Blondie lurked inside a wrapper, waiting its turn to delight. At the next table, a lovely young Asian woman sat worrying over her phone for a time. Then, in what seemed to be frustrated but not unexpected resignation, she rose and walked away with a purpose that suggested a polite but certain homicide was in store for someone, somewhere.

She was soon replaced by an Arlington police officer, who in turn was joined minutes later by a fellow constable. As they both enjoyed a leisurely lunch, they were approached by several folks who asked directions or had similar requests for information. I observed their demeanor as they dealt with the public, for I had already determined that these fellows might be a source of information necessary for some impromptu research I wished to carry out. They were friendly, professional, and unassuming. And so, encouraged by this display, and after waiting for what I regarded as a respectful amount of time before putting them through the momentary suspicion of being interrupted by some nerd reading Thomas Paine, I asked if they would excuse a question or two.

They agreed, so I asked if they had spent any time on motor patrol, and the one officer indicated that he had done so, and that his colleague was currently serving in that capacity. My belief that they could provide the input I needed being confirmed, I asked them to give me their estimation of how many automobile accidents out of every ten on the interstates and other major highways were the result of one car striking another from behind – the proverbial “rear-ender”. As I suspected, they gave me one of what I figured were the two most likely figures - specifically, six. I thought seven possible, but unlikely.

I then asked how many out of those six were caused by the car in the rear speeding up. The first officer said “On purpose?” to which I replied “No, just any case at all." They both agreed that such an occurrence was so rare as to say “Never”. So then, I reasoned out loud, discounting for the moment all the usual issues such as following too closely, talking on the phone – which they both were careful to say was a serious issue on the highways – and other distractions, the majority of accidents on the road were ultimately the result of cars slowing down, most occurrences of which are sudden and, because they are the result of incompetence, entirely unnecessary. I wasn’t trying to excuse following too closely or any other bad driving habit; I just had a different point to make. So far, these two amiable officers were with me in my conclusions.

So then I asked how many of the remaining four occurrences were the result of lane-changes. Leaving room for other factors, they said “Most of them.”

With this, your correspondent was batting a thousand. These officers had confirmed what I was already convinced of, although it’s hardly profound: almost every accident on the highways, the Interstates in particular, are the result of people slowing down and/or changing lanes. In short, changes in velocity – which I trust you realize consists of both speed and direction – are the worst maneuvers to engage in behind the wheel while traveling at high speed.

So, why all this bother? Well, it happened one day while I was rolling down I-64 headed for who-knows-where. I was north of Newport News, westbound in the right lane, when I approached a State Police car that had pulled another driver over, evidently in the process of enhancing the Commonwealth’s revenue stream by means of ticketing someone who probably had done nothing wrong, just something illegal.

A brief aside here, folks: traffic tickets are not intended to change anyone’s driving habits. They are a form of taxation, one that operates on the simple reality that punishment kept below a certain tolerance level will result in no behavioral modification, such modification being undesirable because it will result in a lowering of the revenue generated by repetition of the offending behavior. And spare me any retorts involving driver-improvement courses; if you even thought of that, it indicates a naiveté that would render any explanation pointless.

Back to my experience; as I neared the scene, the officer noticed that I was just moving along as if he wasn’t there, which to outward observation is exactly what I should have been doing, my intent being to pass him safely while doing nothing to interrupt the flow of traffic. In an act that bled righteous indignation, he stopped suddenly while walking back to his vehicle, fixed me with stare that I can only suppose was intended to have some meaning to me, and shot out his right arm with a surprising degree of passion for a Virginia State Trooper, plainly indicating that I should have changed lanes. I remember thinking to myself “Why would I do something so stupid and pointless?”

Why, indeed?

As it turns out, the General Assembly had it in mind to address a very real problem that occurs with frightening regularity, and it was this that occasioned the Trooper’s antics. Every year, there are police officers maimed or killed by vegetables disguised as human beings who manage to slip past the rigid safeguards of the motor vehicle department and get their seed-pods wrapped around a driver’s license. These plant-lifes then get command of what is essentially a non-nuclear missile and proceed to aim it in slip-shod fashion down the roads with the rest of us at metal-tearing speeds. A common affliction among these various cabbages and zucchinis is a tendency not unlike that displayed by a moth when confronted with a bug-zapper: when they see a vehicle with bright flashing lights, they actually steer for it. Folks, I promise you I’m not making this up. There have been many officers killed or seriously wounded by morons who are incapable of understanding the basic law of physics which tells us that two forms of matter cannot occupy the same space at the same time, and the General Assembly, laudably, wants the carnage to stop.
Their answer?

Require the general public to engage in the two activities that cause almost every accident on the highway…


A few days after my encounter with Trooper Indignant, I’m back on the Interstate, going who-knows-where. Imagine my surprise when I see a sign on the side of the road that says “State Law – You must slow down or change lanes when approaching a stationary emergency vehicle”. Or something close to that.
Son of a gun; no wonder that Trooper was waving at me like I was a schoolboy who was about to walk into the wrong bathroom! He thought I was doing something wrong!
I wasn’t, of course, but I was breaking the law, a law of which I had been unaware, or so I would have been told if he caught up with me at the 7-11.

Known as the “Slow Down Move Over” law, Section 46.2 – 921.1 of the Code of Virginia requires motorists who are approaching parked emergency vehicles with flashing lights to change lanes or slow down.
At least that’s what we are told it says.

In another garden-variety example of incompetence by government – you know, the same people who issue driver’s licenses to broccoli – the law’s language is confusing and open to opposing conclusions. In other words, a lawyer’s dream.
We start with the statute’s summary:

§ 46.2-921.1. Drivers to yield right-of-way or reduce speed when approaching stationary emergency vehicles on highways; penalties.

Seems plain, doesn’t it? “You see blinking lights, move over or slow down”.
Okay, I got that.